MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996284643 · doi:10.1002/cjce.22004

Modelling of particulate matter transformations and capture efficiency

2014· article· en· W1996284643 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jonas Sjöblom, Ananda Subramani Kannan, Houman Ojagh, Henrik Ström

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticulatesComputational fluid dynamicsInertDeposition (geology)Work (physics)Substrate (aquarium)Filter (signal processing)Process engineeringMaterials scienceChemistryMechanicsComputer scienceMechanical engineeringEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the current work, a comprehensive computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model is developed for an accurate description of the transport and transformation of automotive particulate matter (PM) in monolithic reactors. The model accounts for the developing gas flow, the evaporation of hydrocarbons (HCs) from the particles, and the adsorption of HCs in the washcoat, as well as motion, shrinkage, and deposition of particles in the channel. The comprehensive CFD model is used to validate a simplified tanks‐in‐series approach with a conceptual model for PM transformations. In the development of more detailed and accurate chemical kinetics for the reactions of PM in filters, it will be necessary to also predict the time‐resolved properties of the particles collected in the filter (e.g., reactivity, amount of adsorbed HCs). It is shown in this work how the data necessary to construct such models can be obtained in situ with the aid of the conceptual model and PM measurements over an inert open substrate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.310
Threshold uncertainty score0.169

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.163
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicAerosol Filtration and Electrostatic PrecipitationFrench-language works237,207