Prometheus Unbound: A Romantic Rewriting of a Classical Myth PROMETHEUS UNBOUND: UNE REECRITURE ROMANTIQUE D'UN MYTHE CLASSIQUE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper examines Shelley’s merit in recreating a wellknown myth, which is adapted to fi t his philosophical and Romantic outlook. Inspired by the French Revolution, the revolutionary fervor of Shelley’s age should determine the interpretation of Prometheus Unbound as an advocacy of rebellion against all forms of tyrannical authority enslaving humans’ souls and minds and limiting their imagination and potential. In dramatizing Prometheus’s suffering and moral regeneration, Shelley suggests that rebellion is fi rst and foremost an internal act, in which an individual must take the full responsibility of reforming the self by rejecting submission to all forms of evil. In other words, Shelley seems to stress the autonomy of the individual’s will and its power in changing society. The ending of the play expresses Shelley’s apocalyptic vision of the world yet his belief in the promise of a new order initiated by man.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".