MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996355922 · doi:10.1109/wamicon.2013.6572749

Novel half mode substrate integrated waveguide power amplifier

2013· article· en· W1996355922 on OpenAlexaff
Zhebin Wang, Chan-Wang Park

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmplifierMicrostripMaterials scienceImpedance matchingSubstrate (aquarium)WaveguidePower (physics)OptoelectronicsdBmElectrical engineeringElectrical impedanceElectronic engineeringEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a novel half mode substrate integrated waveguide (HMSIW) 10W power amplifier (PA) designed with HMSIW matching network (MN) is presented for the first time. The HMSIW-based matching network (MN) is designed with microstrip-to-HMSIW transition and an inductive metalized post in HMSIW. The impedance matching for the fundamental frequency 2.14 GHz is realized by moving the position of the inductive metalized post in the HMSIW. Both the input and output MNs are designed with the proposed HMSIW-based MN concept. One HMSIW-based 10W PA using GaN HEMT at 2.14 GHz is designed, fabricated, and measured. The proposed HMSIW-based PA can be easily connected with any microstrip or SIW-based circuit. Measured results show that the maximum power added efficiency (PAE) is 72.2 % with 40.7 dBm output power and the maximum gain is 20.1 dB. At the design frequency of 2.14 GHz, the size of the proposed HMSIW-based PA is comparable with other microstrip-based PAs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207