MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996432914 · doi:10.7202/1019134ar

Un cas atypique : François Falc’hun (1909-1991), le linguiste de la Mission de folklore musical en Basse-Bretagne de 1939

2013· article· fr· W1996432914 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gilles Goyat

Bibliographic record

VenuePort Acadie Revue interdisciplinaire en études acadiennes · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La participation de l’abbé François Falc’hun à la Mission de folklore musical de Basse-Bretagne de 1939 a été atypique pour plusieurs raisons, dont la communication se propose d’étudier les principales. 1- C’est une mission initiée, organisée et financée de Paris par le gouvernement du Front populaire. 2 - Bretonnant de langue maternelle, F. Falc’hun est alors le bretonnant le plus diplômé en linguistique, peut-être même le seul. Étudiant à l’Université de Paris, il a déjà reçu une formation en phonologie, science humaine alors toute jeune. 3 - La mission utilise les moyens techniques les plus modernes disponibles à l’époque (enregistrements sonores, films). 4 - Les préoccupations religieuses et morales en semblent tout à fait absentes. 5 - Cette mission a été son unique expérience en ce domaine. 6 - Cette mission n’a duré qu’un mois et demi. En revanche, l’étude et l’exploitation des documents recueillis a traîné en longueur pour plusieurs raisons. F. Falc’hun n’en a pas vu la publication, qui n’a été réalisée qu’en 2009 (Cths-Dastum-Crbc, sous la direction de Marie-Barbara Le Gonidec).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.244
Threshold uncertainty score0.486

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePort Acadie Revue interdisciplinaire en études acadiennesSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207