Critical influence of <i>Eschscholzia californica</i> cells nutritional state on secondary metabolite production
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, we investigated the influence of initial internal nutrient concentrations at the time of elicitation on the ability of Eschscholzia californica (EC) cells to produce alkaloids. Three EC cell suspensions cultivated in culture media differing in their PO4(3-) and NO3- contents were sampled daily for 12 days and analyzed for extracellular and intracellular nutrient concentrations. The ability of the cells to produce alkaloids was tested along the three cell suspension cultures. Sampled cells were then further cultured for 7 days in a production medium containing the elicitor and an extraction resin. The alkaloid production of the cells was measured 7 days post-elicitation. In the low-N medium, starch, glucose, and phosphate contents in the biomass was increased by 470, 1624 and 70%, respectively, 10 days after inoculation compared to the control culture in standard B5 medium. Cell concentration was significantly reduced from 10.3 to 8.6 millions cell/mL on this low-N medium compared to the control, nevertheless alkaloid production was multiplied by 39 at day 10 when cells were elicited. Cells grown on the low-N or low-P media accumulated 83% and 188% more carbon, respectively, than control cells at the end of the culture. This intracellular C was mainly stored in the form of starch in low-P medium and both in the form of starch and glucose in the low-N medium. The ability of EC cells to produce alkaloids upon elicitation was shown to be strongly dependent on the initial intracellular C and P content at the time of elicitation. This suggests that reproducibility and productivity during EC cell culture could be enhanced by manipulating the intracellular C and P content at the time of elicitation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".