Changes in Anthropometric Characteristics and Blood Pressure During Adolescence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Studies suggest that sex differences in blood pressure (BP) are established early in life. Sex differences in BP increases that occur during adolescence may be due to differences in changes in anthropometric characteristics. METHODS: Using sex-specific individual growth models, we assessed the effect of height, body mass index (BMI; kg/m), waist circumference, and triceps and subscapular skinfold thickness on changes in systolic BP in a cohort of 1293 adolescents in Montreal, Canada. BP and anthropometry were assessed biannually (1999/2000, 2002, 2004) at mean ages 12.8, 15.2, and 17.0. RESULTS: On average, systolic BP increased by 11.1 mm Hg in boys and 3.2 mm Hg in girls during 5 years. Changes in height explained half of the overall increase in systolic BP in boys and virtually all of the increase in systolic BP in girls. No meaningful sex differences were observed in the association of changes in BMI, waist circumference, and triceps and subscapular skinfold thickness with systolic BP change during 5 years. Increases in 1 BMI unit, 1 cm waist circumference, or 1 mm triceps or subscapular skinfold thickness were associated with increases of 0.7, 0.24, 0.3, and 0.4 mm Hg systolic BP, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although sex differences in mean systolic BP changes during adolescence were largely attributable to differences in gains in height, the effect of gaining weight or body fat on systolic BP change was similar in boys and girls.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Observational | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Observational | low |
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".