MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996450181 · doi:10.1080/15363751003780852

Toward a New Measure for Faith and Civic Engagement: Exploring the Structure of the FACE Scale

2012· article· en· W1996450181 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueChristian Higher Education · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicService-Learning and Community Engagement
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFaithCivic engagementSpiritualitySociologyPoliticsPublic engagementHigher educationReligious studiesMedia studiesTheologyPolitical sciencePublic relationsLawPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Civic and political engagement may encourage individuals to make positive societal contributions and thus act as responsible and productive citizens. A positive relationship between civic/political engagement and the extent of one's faith-based beliefs and behaviors has been the basis for a growing field of research (e.g., Becker & Dhingra, 2001 Becker, P. and Dhingra, P. 2001. Religious involvement and volunteering: Implications for civil society. Sociology of Religion, 62: 315–355. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]; Chickering, 2006 Chickering, A. W. 2006. Strengthening spirituality and civic engagement in higher education. Journal of College & Character, 8(1): 1–5. [Google Scholar]; Dalton, 2006 Dalton, J. C. 2006. Community service and spirituality: Integrating faith, service, and social justice at DePaul University. Journal of College & Character, 8(1): 1–9. [Google Scholar], King, 2008 King, P. E. 2008. “Spirituality as fertile ground for positive youth development”. In Positive youth development and spirituality: From theory to research, 55–73. West Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Foundation Press. R. M. Lerner, R. W. Roeser, & E. Phelps [Google Scholar]; Uslaner, 2002 Uslaner, E. M. 2002. Religion and civic engagement in Canada and the United States. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41(2): 239–254. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). Higher education programs that encourage students’ exploration and expression of faith/spirituality may promote a favorable attitude concerning civic engagement (Chickering, 2006 Chickering, A. W. 2006. Strengthening spirituality and civic engagement in higher education. Journal of College & Character, 8(1): 1–5. [Google Scholar]). Two studies addressed the relationship between civic/political engagement and faith-based perceptions and behaviors among university students (Study 1: n = 762; Study 2: n = 955). Study 1 ran an exploratory factor analysis on a 20-item Faith and Civic Engagement (FACE) scale and Study 2 replicated the factor structure through confirmatory factor analysis. Results identified five reliable and valid subscales: civic engagement, faith life, political importance, (target university) influences spiritual growth, and (target university) influences personal growth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.684
Threshold uncertainty score0.621

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it