MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996464112 · doi:10.1109/embc.2012.6346796

Autonomic-cardiorespiratory regulation: A physiology-based mathematical model

2012· article· en· W1996464112 on OpenAlexaff
Pedram Ataee, L. Belingard, Guy A. Dumont, H. Ahmadi Noubari, W. Thomas Boyce

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsLearning PartnershipUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCardiorespiratory fitnessReflexRespirationRespiratory systemAutonomic nervous systemHeart rateRespiratory rateVenous return curveNeurophysiologyBlood pressureComputer scienceMedicineNeuroscienceCardiologyInternal medicineHemodynamicsPsychologyAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel physiology-based mathematical model of autonomic-cardiorespiratory regulation described by a set of three nonlinear, coupled differential equations. We improved our previously proposed autonomic-cardiac regulation model by considering neuromechanical and mechanical coupling of cardiovascular and respiration systems including lung stretch-receptor reflex and venous return variation. We also introduced a differential equation describing respiration rate regulation which mainly originates in the medullary respiratory center. The results of simulation experiments suggest that the venous return variation generates a higher perturbation on heart rate and blood pressure than lung stretch-receptor reflex. The proposed model is also powerful in determining and removing direct respiratory impacts on parasympathetic activation tone to accurately extract parasympathetic activity caused by emotional states and environmental conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFrench-language works237,207