Ab Initio and Density Functional Predictions of Solvation Free Energies of Cyclic Polyethers (CH2CH2O)n (n=2,6) in Aqueous and Tetrachloromethane Solutions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Solvation free energies ΔGsoltot of cyclic polyethers (CH2CH2O)n (n=2,6) in aqueous and tetrachloromethane solutions have been calculated at HF, MP2 and B3LYP/6-311G (d,p) levels of theory using CPCM, IEFPCM and SMD implicit solvation models. It has been found that ΔGsoltot are negative for both solvents, they increase linearly with system sizes and they are more important in water solution. The electrostatic contributions to the solvation free energies ΔGsolele are also more important in water because of their polar nature. In water, CPCM and IEFPCM models give a close values, which are slightly different from SMD values. In tetrachloromethane solvent CPCM model seems overestimate ΔGsolele. For both solvents the non-electrostatic contributions to the solvation free energies ΔGsoln-ele provided by SMD are remarkably different to those given by CPCM and IEFPCM models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".