Ethylene and Propylene Polymerization Using In Situ Supported Me<sub>2</sub>Si(Ind)<sub>2</sub>ZrCl<sub>2</sub> Catalyst: Experimental and Theoretical Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Summary: Me 2 Si(Ind) 2 ZrCl 2 was in situ immobilized onto SMAO and used for ethylene and propylene polymerization in the presence of TEA or TIBA as cocatalyst. The catalytic system Me 2 Si(Ind) 2 ZrCl 2 /SMAO exhibited different behavior depending on the amount and nature of the alkylaluminum employed and on the monomer type. The catalyst activity was nearly 0.4 kg polymer · g cat −1 · h −1 with both cocatalysts for propylene polymerization. Similar activities were observed for ethylene polymerization in the presence of TIBA. When ethylene was polymerized using TEA at an Al/Zr molar ratio of 250, the activity was 10 times higher. Polyethylenes made by in situ supported or homogeneous catalyst systems had practically the same melting point ( T m ). On the other hand, poly(propylenes) made using in situ supported catalyst systems had a slightly lower T m than poly(propylenes) made using homogeneous catalyst systems. The nature and amount of the alkylaluminum also influenced the molar mass. The poly(propylene) molar mass was higher when TIBA was the cocatalyst. The opposite behavior was observed for the polyethylenes. Concerning the alkylaluminum concentration, the molar mass of the polymers decreased as the amount of TEA increased. In the presence of TIBA, the polyethylene's molar mass was almost the same, independent of the alkylaluminum concentration, and the poly(propylene) molar mass increased with increasing amounts of cocatalyst. The deconvolution of the GPC curves showed 2 peaks for the homogeneous system and 3 peaks for the heterogeneous in situ supported system. The only exception was observed when TEA was used at an Al/Zr molar ratio of 500, where the best fit was obtained with 2 peaks. Based on the GPC deconvolution results and on the theoretical modeling, a proposal for the active site structure was made. Molar mass distribution deconvolution of polyethylene prepared with the system Me 2 Si(Ind) 2 ZrCl 2 /SMAO/TIBA with 500 mol/mol of alkylaluminum as cocatalyst. magnified image Molar mass distribution deconvolution of polyethylene prepared with the system Me 2 Si(Ind) 2 ZrCl 2 /SMAO/TIBA with 500 mol/mol of alkylaluminum as cocatalyst.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".