MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996489833 · doi:10.3109/13506129.2011.638682

Technetium pyrophosphate myocardial uptake and peripheral neuropathy in a rare variant of familial transthyretin (TTR) amyloidosis (Ser23Asn): a case report and literature review

2011· review· en· W1996489833 on OpenAlexaff
Adam Castaño, Sabahat Bokhari, Thomas H. Brannagan, Julia Wynn, Mathew S. Maurer

Bibliographic record

VenueAmyloid · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
Canadian institutionsColumbia College
FundersNational Institute on Aging
KeywordsTransthyretinAmyloidosisMedicinePeripheral neuropathyPathologyCardiac amyloidosisPolyneuropathyInternal medicineEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the fourth case of transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) Ser23Asn in a 41-year-old Ecuadorian male. He has a pedigree that spans seven generations and involves 24 family members who suffered early cardiac death. Salient presenting symptoms were fatigue, shortness of breath, and peripheral neuropathy. The diagnosis of cardiac amyloid was confirmed by immunohistochemical staining of an endomyocardial biopsy, genotyping and by technetium pyrophosphate ((99m)Tc-PYP) scintigraphy, which remains to be established as a reliable tool to visualize myocardial amyloid involvement in patients with the Ser23Asn transthyretin (TTR) variant. The patient underwent successful combined heart and liver transplant. We add to the current ATTR literature that in patients with the rare Ser23Asn mutation, peripheral nerve in addition to cardiac involvement can occur and (99m)Tc-PYP scintigraphy can be used as an imaging modality to visualize myocardial amyloid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmyloidSame topicAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, OutcomesFrench-language works237,207