MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996499076 · doi:10.1109/mcs.2006.1636312

A high-precision, magnetically levitated positioning stage: toward contactless actuation for industrial manufacturing

2006· article· en· W1996499076 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Control Systems · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMagnetic Bearings and Levitation Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsLinear motorControl theory (sociology)LinearizationProcess (computing)Magnetic levitationMotion controlControl engineeringNonlinear systemController (irrigation)MagnetEngineeringFeedback linearizationComputer scienceMechanical engineeringControl (management)PhysicsRobot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the feasibility of using iron-cored permanent magnet linear synchronous motors (PMLSM) to develop microsteppers with multiple DOFs is demonstrated. To do this, the accuracy of the mathematical model of the longitudinal and normal forces generated by one PMLSM as well as the performance of a nonlinear feedback linearization controller are investigated. Demonstration of several PMLSMs together can control three DOFs. In both experimental setups, linear guides are used to constrain the motion to be purely translational. Linear guides entail friction, which is undesirable in the photolithography process. Future research involves eliminating linear guides and controlling six DOFs (translations and rotations of the platform).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.456
Threshold uncertainty score0.977

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it