MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1996504005 · doi:10.1115/caneus2006-11028

Micro Fiber Optical Sensor Interrogation Systems for Aerospace Applications

2006· article· en· W1996504005 on OpenAlexaff
Gao Xiao, Nezih Mrad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development CanadaNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterrogationFiber Bragg gratingMultiplexingMaterials scienceMicrosystemAerospaceFiber optic sensorOptical fiberDemultiplexerWaveguideElectronic engineeringComputer scienceOpticsOptoelectronicsEngineeringNanotechnologyAerospace engineeringTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The emerging field of microsystems technology is enabling the innovative development of a micro optical fiber interrogation system for potential integration into air platforms structural health monitoring and management capabilities. Our efforts in such development is based on micron size optical waveguides using arrayed waveguide gratings (AWG) based demultiplexer for highly multiplexed fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor arrays. In this document, a proposed system concept, its operating principle and proposed interrogation methodology are presented. Initial results demonstrate the ability of the system to obtain measurement resolution of 1 pm or better (equivalent to 0.1°C for temperature sensing) and response time as short as two milli-second. Owing to the small size and ruggedness of AWG, it is potentially feasible to fabricate an all solid state (no moving parts), palm size, robust and high-resolution interrogation system that responds to air platform requirements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors→French-language works237,207→