MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996564539 · doi:10.1159/000179939

Microinjections of L-Leucine into Tubules and Peritubular Capillaries of the Rat

2008· article· en· W1996564539 on OpenAlexaff
Michel G. Bergeron

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œNephron journals/Nephron journals · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle metabolism and nutrition
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroinjectionsLeucineNephronKidneyInternal medicineExcretionAmino acidEndocrinologyPeritubular capillariesMicroinjectionInulinLumen (anatomy)MedicineBiochemistryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Antiluminal and luminal transport of amino acids has been studied in vivo with a microinjection technique in maleate-treated rats. Upon microinjections of l -leucine-3H and inulin-14C in the lumen of proximal convoluted tubules and in peritubular capillaries of the cortical segments of the nephron, the amount of radioactivity measured in ureteral urine gave an indication of amino acid absorption. The results suggest that the entry of amino acids into the renal tubule cells is not impeded in maleate-treated rats and that maleic acid does not act as a competitor for amino acid transport. After microinjections into peritubular capillaries of the left kidney, L-leucine excretion was found to be greater in this experimental kidney than in the contralateral non-injected kidney. However, in maleate-treated rats, the excretion of leucine preceded that of inulin in the experimental kidney in contrast to the non-injected kidney where leucine and inulin excretion occurred simultaneously. It is proposed that this modification of amino acid excretion can be explained by an enhanced transtubular flux of amino acid, caused by a decreased ability of the cell to retain absorbed amino acids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.241
Threshold uncertainty score0.751

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œNephron journals/Nephron journalsSame topicMuscle metabolism and nutritionFrench-language works237,207