MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996579463 · doi:10.1115/1.2363202

Convex Optimization Approach to Observer-Based Stabilization of Uncertain Linear Systems

2005· article· en· W1996579463 on OpenAlexaff
Salim Ibrir

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObserver (physics)Linear matrix inequalityConvex optimizationControl theory (sociology)MathematicsLinear systemMathematical optimizationRegular polygonStability (learning theory)Controller (irrigation)Optimization problemMatrix (chemical analysis)Full state feedbackComputer scienceControl (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New sufficient linear matrix inequality conditions guaranteeing the stability of uncertain linear systems by means of dynamic output feedbacks are presented. It is shown that the search of an observer-based controller for this class of systems is fundamentally decomposed into two main problems: robust stability with a memoryless state feedback and observer design with measured uncertainties. Under the fulfilment of the developed linear matrix inequalities conditions, we show that the observer-based problem is solvable without any need for some equality constraints or iterative computational algorithms. Examples showing the potential of the results are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and ControlSame topicStability and Control of Uncertain SystemsFrench-language works237,207