MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996579976 · doi:10.3989/gladius.2010.0002

Les armes du dépôt du Cailar (Gard, France) IIIe siècle avant notre ère

2010· article· es· W1996579976 on OpenAlexaff
Benjamin Girard, Réjane Roure, Henri Duday, Sandrine Lenorzer, Elsa Ciesielski, Armelle Gardeisen, Jean Cantuel, Aurélien Creuzieux, Michel Py

Bibliographic record

VenueGladius · 2010
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAncient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Un gran número de distintos tipos de armas ha sido hallado en el yacimiento arqueológico de Le Cailar (Gard, Francia). Este asentamiento protohistórico está ubicado en el valle bajo del Ródano y fue fundado a mediados, o quizás a inicios, del siglo VI a.C. Le Cailar fue un importante puerto de comercio donde están atestiguadas distintas producciones mediterráneas, en especial vino y cerámica. La relación con la ciudad focense de Massalia fue seguramente intensa. Durante el siglo III a.C., un vasto espacio sagrado fue creado a lo largo de las murallas. En este espacio han sido halladas numerosas armas, otros objetos metálicos y fragmentos de calaveras humanas (cabezas cortadas), así como monedas y fragmentos de huesos animales y de cerámica. Estos elementos arrojan luz sobre las prácticas rituales relacionadas con la guerra durante el siglo III a.C. [fr] Différents types d’armes ont été retrouvés en grand nombre sur le site du Cailar (Gard, France). Cet établissement protohistorique est situé dans la basse vallée du Rhône et fut fondé au milieu, ou peut-être au début, du VIe s. a.C. Le Cailar fut un important port de commerce où sont attestés différentes productions d’origine méditerranéennes, comme le vin et la céramique. Les relations avec la cité phocéenne de Massalia furent probablement importantes. Au cours du IIIe s. a.C., une vaste aire sacrée fut créée le long des murailles. A l’intérieur de cet espace ont été retrouvés des armes et divers objets métalliques, ainsi que des fragments de crânes humains (têtes coupées), des monnaies et des fragments de céramiques et d’os animaux. Ces éléments permettent d’éclairer les pratiques rituelles liées à la guerre au IIIe s. a.C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.229
Threshold uncertainty score0.456

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGladiusSame topicAncient and Medieval Archaeology StudiesFrench-language works237,207