Modeling of time-resolved light extinction and its applications to visibility management in the Lower Fraser Valley of British Columbia, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is the dominant cause of atmospheric visibility degradation in the Lower Fraser Valley (LFV) of British Columbia, where poor visibility due to air pollution is of concern. The spatial coverage of the current LFV visibility monitoring network is relatively low, with large parts of the airshed not being represented. Given the desire on the part of local and regional governments to manage visibility in the LFV airshed, the development of a method that allows near real-time estimation of 1-hr light extinction data from the dense network of PM measurements would be highly beneficial. This paper describes a simple linear algorithm, developed using the Hybrid method, to estimate near real-time 1-hr total light extinction at four monitoring sites in the LFV. Model inputs include ambient hourly PM2.5, NO2, relative humidity measurements, and historical monthly-averaged aerosol composition. The results indicate that the developed model can provide relatively accurate and time-resolved estimates of extinction in regions where visibility is not being monitored, thus extending the spatial coverage of the regional visibility monitoring network. The model was also applied to a number of policy-related scenarios to inform visual air quality management in the study area. Results indicated that in order to achieve a perceptible improvement (1.0 deciview) relative to baseline average visibility conditions in the LFV airshed, average ambient PM2.5 concentration would have to decrease by 17% from baseline conditions. Furthermore, to achieve a 20% increase in the number of daylight hours with "excellent" visibility, average PM2.5 would need to be reduced by 30%. Model simulations also indicated that "across-the-board" emission reduction policies would result in greater improvements for the "worst 20%" visibility conditions than for the "best 20%" conditions, suggesting that reducing the number of "poor" visibility days would be easier than improving the number of "excellent" visibility days. IMPLICATIONS: This study describes the development of a model using standard air quality monitoring data (PM2.5, NO2, relative humidity, and PM speciation profiles) to provide near real-time estimates of time-resolved extinction in regions where direct optical monitoring is not available. Applications of the model include extension of spatial coverage of a visibility network, testing various air quality scenarios to inform visibility management, and as a tool for setting visual air quality standards in impacted airsheds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".