A New Method for Next-Day Price Forecasting for PJM Electricity Market
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the framework of the competitive electricity markets, electricity price forecasting is important for market participants in a deregulated electricity market. Rather than forecasting the value, market participants are sometimes more interested interval of the peak electricity price forecasting. Forecasting the peak price is essential for estimating the uncertainty involved in the price and thus is highly useful for making generation bidding strategies and investment decisions. The choice of the forecasting model becomes the important influence factor how to improve price forecasting accuracy. This paper proposes new approach to reduce the prediction error at occurrence time of the peak electricity price, and aims to enhance the accuracy of the next day electricity price forecasting. In the proposed method, the weekly variation data is used for input factors of the ANN at occurrence time of the peak electricity price in order to catch the price variation. Moreover, learning data for the ANN is selected by rough sets theory at occurrence time of the peak electricity price. This method is examined by using the data of the PJM electricity market. From the simulation results, it is observed that the proposed method provides a more accurate and effective forecasting, which helpful for suitable bidding strategy and risk management tool for market participants in a deregulated electricity market.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".