MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996680536 · doi:10.7202/010918ar

Les jeunes adultes québécois et le crédit*

2005· article· fr· W1996680536 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Marie J. Lachance, Pierre Beaudoin, Jean Robitaille

Bibliographic record

VenueEnfances Familles Générations · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Connaissances, attitude et pratiques reliées au crédit de même que nature et niveau des dettes sont les aspects qui ont été évalués chez des Québécois de 18 à 29 ans. Les résultats indiquent que ces jeunes utilisent les produits de crédit à un niveau relativement élevé, mais connaissent peu leur fonctionnement. Leur attitude face au crédit et à l’endettement est partagée et une majorité d’entre eux prétend avoir certaines pratiques socialement désirables. Plus de 75% des jeunes ont au moins une dette, la plus répandue étant la dette d’étude, suivie du solde impayé sur une carte de crédit. L’étude permet de confirmer que le niveau d’utilisation du crédit et le nombre de jeunes ayant des dettes a cru considérablement depuis 10 ans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.870
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2005
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnfances Familles GénérationsSame topicFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisFrench-language works237,207