Theoretical study on six-fold coordinated silicon in silicophosphate compounds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Extended Hückel tight-binding (EHTB) calculations were performed on silicophosphate compounds with six-coordinated silicon. Speculative structures related to silicon coordination in SiP2O7 are reported. To account for the particular structural distortion caused by the presence of SiO6 in the silicon pyrophosphate, it is important to examine how the stability and the band gap of the extended structure of SiP2O7 are affected. Different theoretical tools are used (EHTB, ab initio Hartree–Fock, and density functional theory DFT-B3LYP). To obtain detailed descriptions of the incorporation of hexacoordinated silicon in this material, the band structures in SiP2O7 and [P2O7]4– were analyzed. It seems that the diffuse orbitals of silicon and the high energy of the Si 3p orbital lead to higher energy coordination and contribute to the breaking of the P-O-P bridge and the forming of a Si-O-P entity in this material. In addition, to provide more evidence of the existence of the octahedral silicon coordination in SiP2O7 (1), two model clusters [P4Si2O23H18] (2) and [P4Si2O19H10] (3) involving silicon atoms in octahedral and tetrahedral sites were investigated using Hartree–Fock and DFT theories. A remarkable agreement between calculated and experimental bond lengths for Si—O and P—O is obtained using the DFT calculation. The model cluster 2 corroborates the structural change in the Si-O-P and P-O-P fragments seen in 1. The IR vibrational frequencies are calculated for both model clusters and are predicted to shift towards lower frequencies in the octahedral Si sites, which is consistent with experimental data.Key words: silicophosphate, SiO6, band structure, tight-binding calculations, Hartree-Fock, DFT, B3LYP, model cluster, IR frequencies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".