Incidental Early Stage Endometrial Adenocarcinoma Diagnosed by F-18 FDG PET-CT, Which Was Negative on Ultrasound and Nonspecific on MRI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 65-year-old woman with a history of gastric adenocarcinoma was referred for a follow-up F-18 FDG PET-CT scan. Although there was no evidence of recurrence of her gastric malignancy, there was an incidental finding of mild focal FDG uptake in the mid uterus. This was considered suspicious, especially in a postmenopausal woman, and she was referred for further imaging. Ultrasound did not find any abnormalities, and MRI reported a nonspecific focus of mild endometrial thickening. Extensive histopathological sampling of the endometrium revealed a focus of intramucosal endometrial adenocarcinoma; the patient was diagnosed with Stage IA disease and treated surgically. This case demonstrates the importance of alerting referring physicians to even mildly FDG-avid focal abnormalities of the endometrium of postmenopausal women, despite normal or nonspecific correlative diagnostic imaging results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".