MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

LOAD FLOW SOLUTION FOR ILL-CONDITIONED BY HOMOTOPY CONTINUATION METHOD

2008· article· en· W1996700210 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
H.-C. Chen, Lyinn Chung

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Power and Energy Systems · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimal Power Flow Distribution
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvergence (economics)HomotopyElectric power systemFlexibility (engineering)MathematicsContinuationHomotopy analysis methodFlow (mathematics)Mathematical optimizationPower flowNewton's methodPower (physics)Control theory (sociology)Applied mathematicsComputer scienceNonlinear systemArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although the Newton-Raphson method possesses very powerful convergence characteristics, this algorithm can not have a guarantee for finding load flow solutions if the power system is ill-conditioned. In this paper, the application of the homotopy method to solve the ill-conditioned system is proposed and discussed. This method merits attention to the flexibility of choosing the initial guess values. To present this superiority, different cases of ill-conditioned power systems are tested. Numerical convergence is discussed for each particular case. It is ideally suitable for finding load flow solutions of ill-conditioned power systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Power and Energy SystemsSame topicOptimal Power Flow DistributionFrench-language works237,207