MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996700715 · doi:10.1109/iecon.2012.6389198

Comparative study of speed estimation techniques for sensorless vector control of induction machine

2012· article· en· W1996700715 on OpenAlex
Abdelrahaman Yousif Eshag Lesan, Mamadou Lamine Doumbia, Pierre Sicard

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSensorless Control of Electric Motors
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)Vector controlElectronic speed controlControl theory (sociology)EstimatorComputer scienceInduction motorMachine controlNoise immunityControl engineeringNoise (video)Position (finance)EngineeringControl (management)Artificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sensorless vector control is applied to variable speed (AC) motor drives where speed estimators and observers are used instead of the costly speed or position sensors. Eliminating speed and position sensors reduces hardware complexity and cost, increases the mechanical robustness and reliability of the drive, and leads to a better noise immunity. However, some of these speed estimation techniques could be used only in low-cost drive applications not requiring high dynamic performance. The paper presents analytical study and simulation results of induction machine speed sensorless vector control where various speed estimation techniques are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.440
Threshold uncertainty score0.468

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSensorless Control of Electric MotorsFrench-language works237,207