MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996715445 · doi:10.1109/acc.2010.5531323

Formation control of VTOL UAVs without linear-velocity measurements

2010· article· en· W1996715445 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsLakehead UniversityWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)ThrustTorqueAngular velocityAttitude controlComputer scienceControl (management)Vehicle dynamicsControl engineeringSimulationEngineeringAerospace engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We address the formation control problem without linear-velocity measurements for a group of Vertical Take-Off and Landing (VTOL) Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) with a fixed and undirected communication topology. The vehicles among the team are required to track a desired reference linear-velocity and maintain a desired formation. Our control design is achieved in two main steps. First, an intermediary control input is designed for the translational dynamics, from which we extract the desired system attitude and thrust achieving the formation objective. Then, the torque input for the rotational dynamics of each vehicle is designed to drive the actual attitudes to the desired ones. To obviate the need for linear-velocity, we use instrumental auxiliary variables in each step of the control design. The stability of the overall closed loop system is rigorously established. Simulation results are provided to show the effectiveness of the proposed control scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score0.469

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDistributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsFrench-language works237,207