Bibliographic record
Abstract
Par souci d’efficacité pédagogique, la plupart des systèmes éducatifs tendent à diversifier leur offre d’éducation en l’adaptant aux différents publics scolaires accueillis, et favorisent à cette fin l’autonomie des établissements scolaires. Dans quelle mesure cette autonomie est-elle effectivement exercée ? N’est-elle pas limitée par les réglementations nationales, les modalités d’organisation et de fonctionnement des différents systèmes éducatifs, par les pouvoirs des collectivités territoriales, etc. ? Quels sont, d’autre part, pour les établissements, les objectifs, les moyens et les outils de l’autonomie ? Parmi ceux-ci, peut-on compter les projets d’établissements, les projets pédagogiques ? Si oui, à quelles conditions (de validation, de suivi, de contrôle) ? Quelles mesures prendre, quelles conditions assurer pour que l’autonomie s’avère un facteur d’efficacité pédagogique et favorise une meilleure réussite des élèves ? Études de cas : Angleterre, Canada, Pays-Bas, Portugal, France
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.633 | 0.415 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".