Analysis by NMR Spectroscopy of the Structural Homology between the Linear and the Cyclic Peptide Recognized by Anti-human Leukocyte Antigen Class I Monoclonal Antibody TP25.99*
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I monoclonal antibody (mAb) TP25.99 has a unique specificity since it recognizes both a conformational and a linear determinant expressed on the beta(2)-mu-associated and beta(2)-mu-free HLA class I heavy chains, respectively. Previously, we reported the identification of a cyclic and a linear peptide that inhibits mAb TP25.99 binding to the beta(2)-mu-associated and beta(2)-mu-free HLA class I heavy chains (S. A. Desai, X. Wang, E. J. Noronha, Q. Zhou, V. Rebmann, H. Grosse-Wilde, F. J. Moy, R. Powers, and S. Ferrone, submitted for publication). The linear X(19) and cyclic LX-8 peptides contain sequence homologous to residues 239-242, 245, and 246 and to residues 194-198, respectively, of HLA class I heavy chain alpha(3) domain. Analysis by two-dimensional transfer nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy of the induced solution structures of the linear X(19) and cyclic LX-8 peptides in the presence of mAb TP25.99 showed that the two peptides adopt a similar structural motif despite the lack of sequence homology. The backbone fold is suggestive of a short helical segment followed by a tight turn, reminiscent of the determinant loop region (residues 194-198) on beta(2)-mu-associated HLA class I heavy chains. The structural similarity between the linear X(19) and cyclic LX-8 peptides and the lack of sequence homology suggests that mAb TP25.99 predominantly recognizes a structural motif instead of a consensus sequence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".