MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996763948 · doi:10.1063/1.1895720

First-order mean spherical approximation for attractive, repulsive, and multi-Yukawa potentials

2005· article· en· W1996763948 on OpenAlexaff
Yiping Tang, Yangzheng Lin, Yigui Li

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsHoneywell (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsYukawa potentialCompressibilityStatistical physicsPhysicsInternal energyFunction (biology)Radial distribution functionOrder (exchange)Distribution functionSimple (philosophy)Phase (matter)ThermodynamicsClassical mechanicsQuantum mechanicsMolecular dynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The first-order mean spherical approximation (FMSA) theory proposed by Tang et al. [Fluid Phase Equilib., 134, 21(1997)] is applied for studying several typical Yukawa fluids, including attractive, repulsive, and multi-Yukawa cases. The FMSA study is particularly advantageous in providing thermodynamics and structure information in a simple, analytical, and consistent manner. Comparisons with the latest reported computer simulation data for compressibility factor, internal energy, and radial distribution function show that FMSA performs very well and the performance is very close to the full MSA and to several other theories, developed individually for the above-mentioned cases or properties. The present study provides solid evidence to support FMSA applications to more complex fluids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicPhase Equilibria and ThermodynamicsFrench-language works237,207