Design and Synthesis of Novel Pyridoxine 5‘-Phosphonates as Potential Antiischemic Agents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On the basis of previous reports that the natural cofactor pyridoxal 5'-phosphate 1 appears to display cardioprotective properties, a series of novel mimetics of this cofactor were envisioned. As pyridoxal 5'-phosphate is a natural compound and is subject to biological degradation and elimination pathways, the objective was to generate active phosphonates that are potentially less light sensitive and more stable in vivo than the parent vitamer. Several phosphonates were designed and synthesized, and in particular, compounds 10 and 14 displayed similar biological traits to natural phosphate 1 in the rat model of regional myocardial ischemia and reperfusion. A reduction in infarct size was observed in animals treated with these compounds. In an effort to identify other relevant cardioprotective models in order to potentially define structure-activity relationships, these three compounds were tested in the rat working heart model. Compounds 1, 10, and 14 were compared to dichloroacetic acid (DCA) as positive control in this model. As with DCA, compounds 1, 10, and 14 were found to induce a shift from fatty acid oxidation toward glucose oxidation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".