Non-Parallel Response of Amylase and Chymotrypsinogen Biosynthesis following Pancreatic Stimulation: a Possible Explanation for Observed Non-Parallelism in Pancreatic Secretion
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The response of amylase and chymotrypsinogen to a pancreatic secretory stimulation (intragastric administration of oleic acid or sodium oleate) are compared in rats. This comparison concerned the rates of biosynthesis of the two enzymes, their intrapancreatic levels of storage and their rates of excretion in the juice. In each of these 3 steps, it was found that the stimulation induced non-parallel courses of amylase and chymotrypsinogen. The non-parallelism in the rates of biosynthesis was found unable to explain the entire non-parallelism observed in the rates of excretion. These results suggest that the mechanism which controls the proportions of the different enzymes in the juice is different from that which monitors the rates of individual enzymes biosynthesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it