MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996801771 · doi:10.1051/jp4:2000308

Basic considerations on broken-symmetry states of organic superconductors

2000· article· fr· W1996801771 on OpenAlexaff
C. Bourbonnais

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal de Physique IV (Proceedings) · 2000
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMaterials Science
TopicOrganic and Molecular Conductors Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuperconductivityAntiferromagnetismPairingSymmetry (geometry)Condensed matter physicsSpin (aerodynamics)PhysicsFocus (optics)Theoretical physicsChemistryThermodynamicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this brief account, we shall review the different mechanisms giving rise to itinerant and localized antiferromagnetism in quasi-one-dimensional organic conductors: the Bechgaard salts and their sulfur analogs. We will then focus on the problem of spin correlations and their impact on the pairing mechanism for organic superconductivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal de Physique IV (Proceedings)Same topicOrganic and Molecular Conductors ResearchFrench-language works237,207