MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996802604 · doi:10.1109/jssc.2005.856578

An 80-Gb/s 2/sup 31/-1 pseudorandom binary sequence generator in SiGe BiCMOS technology

2005· article· en· W1996802604 on OpenAlexaff
Timothy O. Dickson, E. Laskin, I. Khalid, R. Beerkens, Jingqiong Xie, Boris Karajica, Sorin P. Voinigescu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsSTMicroelectronics (Canada)University of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPseudorandom binary sequencePseudorandom number generatorMultiplexerBiCMOSElectrical engineeringGenerator (circuit theory)Heterojunction bipolar transistorShift registerElectronic engineeringPhysicsComputer scienceBinary numberMaterials scienceBipolar junction transistorMultiplexingEngineeringVoltageTransistorAlgorithmMathematicsArithmeticChip

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 2/sup 31/-1 pseudorandom binary sequence (PRBS) generator with adjustable output data rates up to 80 Gb/s is reported in a production 130-nm BiCMOS process with 150-GHz f/sub T/ SiGe heterojunction bipolar transistor (HBT). The pseudorandom sequence is generated at 20 Gb/s using a linear feedback shift register (FSR), which is then multiplexed up to 80 Gb/s with a 4:1 multiplexer. A BiCMOS logic family combining MOSFETs and SiGe HBTs on high-speed paths is employed throughout the PRBS generator to maximize building block switching speed. Adjustable delay cells are inserted into critical clock paths to improve timing margins throughout the system. The PRBS generator consumes 9.8 W from a 3.3-V supply and can deliver an output voltage swing of up to 430 mV single-ended at 80 Gb/s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Solid-State CircuitsSame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207