MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1996803024 · doi:10.1196/annals.1433.041

<i>Post‐Schiff Base Chemistry of the Maillard Reaction</i>

2008· article· en· W1996803024 on OpenAlexafffund
Fong Lam Chu, Varoujan A. Yaylayan

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced Glycation End Products research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaillard reactionChemistryIsomerizationAzomethine ylideSchiff baseImineAldimineCycloadditionOrganic chemistryPhotochemistryStereochemistry1,3-Dipolar cycloadditionCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Schiff bases play a critical role, not only in initiating the Maillard reaction, but also in its propagation. Little attention has been paid so far to the ability of these imines to undergo isomerization and thus contribute to the diversity of Maillard reaction products. In this study, imine isomerization through 5-oxazolidinone formation was explored in a phenylalanine/glyceraldehyde model system, and spectroscopic evidence was provided for its formation by taking advantage of the strong carbonyl absorption band centered at 1784 cm(-1). The importance of 5-oxazolidinone formation lies in its ability to decarboxylate to azomethine ylide and subsequently form two isomeric imines, each capable of producing distinct Maillard products. Evidence for the formation of such ylides was also provided through their ability to undergo 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition with dipolarophiles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences→Same topicAdvanced Glycation End Products research→French-language works237,207→