MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996807539 · doi:10.1159/000119878

Animal Models of Intraocular Lymphomas

2008· review· en· W1996807539 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Valérie Touitou, Bahram Bodaghi, Yvonne de Kozak, Phuc LeHoang, Catherine Sautès‐Fridman, Sylvain Fisson

Bibliographic record

VenueOphthalmic Research · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut National Du CancerFondation de FranceInstitute of Cancer ResearchUniversité Pierre et Marie CurieInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
KeywordsIntraocular lymphomaLymphomaAnimal modelPathogenesisMedicineCancer researchBiologyImmunologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Primary intraocular lymphoma is a high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma whose pathogenesis is still unclear. Few animal models exist in order to study this condition. Although intraocular lymphomas in humans are usually B cell lymphomas, most of these models are T cell lymphomas. Recently, a major step forward has been realized with the development of new models of intraocular B cell lymphoma. New therapeutic tools are being evaluated in these models of B cell lymphoma. We evaluate the contribution of the different animal models available to study intraocular lymphomas, and we discuss the new therapeutic strategies and their various targets in the tumor as well as in the environment, which are currently investigated through the development of these models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.368
GPT teacher head0.500
Teacher spread0.131 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOphthalmic ResearchSame topicCNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207