MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996807539 · doi:10.1159/000119878

Animal Models of Intraocular Lymphomas

2008· review· en· W1996807539 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOphthalmic Research · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut National Du CancerFondation de FranceInstitute of Cancer ResearchUniversité Pierre et Marie CurieInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
KeywordsIntraocular lymphomaLymphomaAnimal modelPathogenesisMedicineCancer researchBiologyImmunologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Primary intraocular lymphoma is a high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma whose pathogenesis is still unclear. Few animal models exist in order to study this condition. Although intraocular lymphomas in humans are usually B cell lymphomas, most of these models are T cell lymphomas. Recently, a major step forward has been realized with the development of new models of intraocular B cell lymphoma. New therapeutic tools are being evaluated in these models of B cell lymphoma. We evaluate the contribution of the different animal models available to study intraocular lymphomas, and we discuss the new therapeutic strategies and their various targets in the tumor as well as in the environment, which are currently investigated through the development of these models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.368
GPT teacher head0.500
Teacher spread0.131 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it