MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996817674 · doi:10.1139/t04-018

Coupled hydromechanical modeling of rock fractures under normal stress

2004· article· en· W1996817674 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marjorie Bart, J.F. Shao, Dariusz Łydżba, M Haji-Sotoudeh

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRock Mechanics and Modeling
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoromechanicsBiot numberGeotechnical engineeringGeologyFracture (geology)MechanicsPore water pressureStress (linguistics)Rock mechanicsNonlinear systemConstitutive equationMaterials scienceFinite element methodStructural engineeringPorosityPorous mediumEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a nonlinear poromechanical model is developed for a single rock fracture under normal stress. The fracture is represented by a set of voids, and the progressive fracture displacement is considered as a modification process of void space. Based on experimental data obtained from three representative rock fractures, the constitutive model is formulated through an extension of Biot poroelasticity theory to a saturated fracture. A generalized poroelastic coupling coefficient is introduced to describe the interaction between pore fluid pressure and fracture deformation. This coefficient is expressed as a function of fracture aperture. Five parameters involved in the model have been determined from mechanical and poromechanical compression tests. The validity of the model is checked on fluid flow tests under different normal stresses. Comparisons between numerical simulations and experimental data are provided.Key words: hydromechanical coupling, interfaces, joints, poroelasticity, rock mechanics, fractures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.719
Threshold uncertainty score0.772

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicRock Mechanics and ModelingFrench-language works237,207