MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996826860 · doi:10.1109/aero.2007.352861

RADARSAT-2 Antenna

2007· article· en· W1996826860 on OpenAlexaffabout
S. Riendeau, Corinne Grenier

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Optimization
Canadian institutionsSte. Anne's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntenna (radio)SpacecraftElectrical engineeringSynthetic aperture radarRadarEngineeringComputer scienceRemote sensingTelecommunicationsAerospace engineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The design of RADARSAT-2, scheduled for launch in 2007, has been driven by the needs of the global Earth observation markets. The RADARSAT-2 Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) antenna is a state-of-the-art active array designed, built and tested by MDA in its Montreal facilities. The large 15 m times 1.4 m antenna is comprised of 512 subarrays that are each connected to a Transmit/Receive (T/R) module. High performance electronics provide power and control to the T/R modules. These units along with Radio Frequency (RF) power divider networks and harnesses are mounted on four integrated aluminum panels that are deployed on a Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic (CFRP) extendable support structure. The lower level units were built and tested before being integrated to the antenna. The antenna went through acceptance testing that included environmental and near field range tests. Good correlation was obtained between the predicted and the measured performances. The antenna met all expectations and at the time of writing this paper, has been integrated to the spacecraft.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAntenna Design and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207