Morphometric Evaluation of Screw Fixation in Atlas via Posterior Arch and Lateral Mass
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: This study is a result of manual and radiologic measurements of 50 isolated anatomic specimens of C1 and five patients of atlantoaxial instability treated by screw fixation via posterior arch and lateral mass. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the feasibility of screw placement via posterior arch and lateral mass in atlas. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several types of posterior approaches have been adopted for stabilization and fusion of atlantoaxial complex. Before this study, Gallie in 1939 gave a report on a posterior wiring technique that depended on a structural bone graft. Since then, double-looped wiring with two bone grafts and Halifax clamp technique had been introduced. A transarticular screw fixation technique was introduced by Magerl and Seeman in 1987, and a C1 lateral mass screw fixation technique was described by Harms in 2001. However, the feasibility of screw fixation in atlas via posterior arch and lateral mass has not been addressed until now. METHODS: Fifty dry samples of atlas were measured manually and radiologically with vernier calipers, protractors, and CT. The parameters of posterior arch, lateral mass, vertebral artery groove, axis length of screw path via posterior arch and lateral mass, the entry point, and screw direction were measured. Five patients of atlantoaxial instability were treated with this technique and the radiographs and CT scans were evaluated after surgery. RESULTS: The longest trajectory distance of the screw path was about 30 mm. The outer thickness at the thinnest part of groove was 4.58 mm, and it was found to be <4 mm in four cases (8%). The entry point is 18-20 mm lateral to the midline and 2 mm superior to the inferior border of posterior arch. The direction of screw placement is perpendicular to the coronal plane and about 5 degrees cephalad to the transverse plane. Ten screws via posterior arch and lateral mass were placed properly, without incidence of nerve or blood vessel injury in clinical practice. CONCLUSION: Atlas is capable for screw fixation via its posterior arch and lateral mass.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".