MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996841697 · doi:10.1063/1.2353397

Influence of surface Si–Ag bonds on photoluminescence of porous silicon

2006· article· en· W1996841697 on OpenAlexaff
Yingwei Lu, Xi‐Wen Du, Jing Sun, Xu Han, Sergei A. Kulinich

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSilicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Tianjin CityTianjin UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPhotoluminescencePorous siliconMaterials scienceSiliconPorosityChemical engineeringPorous mediumDeposition (geology)MetalComposite materialMetallurgyOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Porous silicon with surface Si–Ag bonds was prepared by depositing Ag on conventional electrochemically prepared porous silicon using electrodeposition method, and the influence of surface-bonded Ag on photoluminescence properties of the material was studied. Photoluminescence intensity of porous silicon increases with the amount of surface Si–Ag bonds formed during electrochemical deposition. Further treatment leads to increased amounts of Ag–O and Ag–Ag bonds on the material surface. Such layers of oxygen-bonded and metallic Ag are shown to retard the light emission from porous silicon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score0.775

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicSilicon Nanostructures and PhotoluminescenceFrench-language works237,207