MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

INTAKE OF NITRATES AND NITRITES AND BIRTH DEFECTS IN OFFSPRING

2004· article· en· W1996844281 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jean D. Brender, Janus McCallum Olive, Marilyn Felkner, Lucina Suarez, Katherine Hendricks, Wendy Marckwardt

Bibliographic record

VenueEpidemiology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFolate and B Vitamins Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnencephalyOffspringOdds ratioMedicineNitrateSpina bifidaNeural tube defectPregnancyPhysiologyInternal medicineFetusBiologyPediatricsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ISEE-464 Abstract: N-nitroso compounds are known to induce central nervous system and musculoskeletal malformations in animal models. Nitrate is converted through bacterial and enzyme action to nitrite, which then can react with amines, amino acids, and other compounds to form N-nitroso compounds. Results have been mixed whether nitrates in drinking water and diet are associated with congenital malformations in human offspring. Studies conducted among women in Australia and Canada found higher levels of drinking water nitrate associated with central nervous system abnormalities. Increased risks for anencephaly, but not for spina bifida were noted among California women whose drinking water nitrates were greater than or equal to 5 mg/L. In that study, risk for neural tube defects (NTDs) was inversely associated with dietary intake of nitrates and nitrites, but odds ratios (ORs) were consistent with unity. In a Swedish study, no appreciable risk for congenital cardiac defects was found with maternal exposure to drinking water nitrates greater than or equal to 2 mg/L. We examined the relation between nitrates in drinking water and diet and risk of NTD-affected pregnancies among Mexican American women living along the Texas-Mexico border. In the case-control study, 184 women with NTD-affected pregnancies and 225 women with normal live births were interviewed about their diets during the periconceptional period. For a subset (n=110), water nitrates were also measured from samples obtained from the reported usual periconceptional drinking water source. We noted an inverse relation between NTD risk and increasing levels of intake for both dietary nitrates and nitrites. However, with higher protein intake (116+ gm/day) in conjunction with lower vitamin C intake (<228 mg/day), the ORs for nitrate (65+ vs. <65 mg/day) and total nitrite intake (9+ vs. <9 mg/day) were 2.1 and 3.8, respectively compared with ORs of 0.48 and 0.40 if vitamin C intake was higher (228+ mg/day). Women whose drinking water nitrates measured 3.52 mg/L or greater (median of controls’ samples) were 1.9 times more likely to have an NTD-affected pregnancy (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.8-4.6). The higher water nitrate levels were associated with an increased risk for spina bifida (OR = 7.8, 95% CI=1.6-74.6), but not for anencephaly (OR=1.0, 95% CI=0.3-2.7). Water nitrates and total dietary nitrites were also found to modify risk of NTDs associated with nitrosatable drug exposure. More research is needed on the interactions of nitrates and nitrites with drugs and dietary nutrients and risk of birth defects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.235

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpidemiologySame topicFolate and B Vitamins ResearchFrench-language works237,207