MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996855294 · doi:10.4296/cwrj2703263

Wastewater Treatment Using Constructed Wetlands

2002· article· en· W1996855294 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Alan Kirby

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicConstructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWetlandMarshWastewaterEnvironmental scienceSewage treatmentEffluentNova scotiaHydrology (agriculture)Surface waterSubsurface flowEnvironmental engineeringConstructed wetlandGroundwaterEngineeringEcologyGeologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reviews the technology of using constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. The paper summarizes the functions and values of natural wetlands and discusses the two main constructed wetland types, free water surface systems and subsurface flow systems. The design criteria for each type are reviewed and typical value ranges are given. The River Hebert Marsh in Nova Scotia is discussed as a case study for free water surface wetland systems. The River Hebert Marsh provides wastewater effluent polishing and the discharge from this marsh does not adversely affect the receiving environment, the waters of the Hebert River.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriquesSame topicConstructed Wetlands for Wastewater TreatmentFrench-language works237,207