MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1996911930 · doi:10.1021/ja042259d

Direct Observation of a 14-Electron Ruthenacyclobutane Relevant to Olefin Metathesis

2005· article· en· W1996911930 on OpenAlexaff
Patricio E. Romero, Warren E. Piers

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRutheniumChemistryPropeneOlefin metathesisMetathesisOlefin fiberYield (engineering)EthyleneCarbon-13 NMRPhosphoniumRing-opening metathesis polymerisationCatalysisPhotochemistryOrganic chemistryPolymerizationThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 14-electron ruthenium phosphonium alkylidene complex [(IH2Mes)Cl2Ru=CH(PCy3)][B(C6F5)4], 1b, a highly active olefin metathesis catalyst, reacts with stoichiometric quantities of ethylene at -50 degrees C in CD2Cl2 to generate the ruthenacyclobutane complex [(IH2Mes)Cl2RuCH2CH2CH2], 2, and [CH2=CH(PCy3)][B(C6F5)4] in quantitative yield by NMR spectroscopy. 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopies on 2 and 2-13C3 are consistent with a symmetrical C2v structure, providing the first experimental information concerning this crucial intermediate in ruthenium-mediated olefin metathesis. At -50 degrees C, exchange with free ethylene takes place on the chemical time scale. Complex 2 decomposes in solution upon warming to room temperature, generating propene and unknown ruthenium product(s).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations205
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicSynthetic Organic Chemistry MethodsFrench-language works237,207