MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Applied Technology for Tight Oil in Engineering of Oil Manufacturing in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin

2014· article· en· W1996916951 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yu Bin Su, Heng Zheng

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Mechanics and Materials · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTight oilOil shalePetroleum engineeringUnconventional oilShale oilGeologyFossil fuelTight gasStructural basinSedimentary basinDrillingSedimentary rockHydraulic fracturingShale gasChinaDirectional drillingGeochemistryEngineeringPaleontologyGeographyWaste managementArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canada is the second country after the US to start the shale gas exploration and production in the world. And the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin (WCSB) is known for its rich shale gas reserves. However, with the development of shale gas, it is found that the success of the United States is difficult to replicate. In addition, many oil companies were forced to transfer their focus of exploration and development from shale gas to tight oil for the extended downturn of gas-price in recent years. Afterwards, abundant resources of tight oil were discovered in northeast Alberta located in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin. This paper studies the developing history and current situation of tight oil, and review the horizontal well drilling technology, stimulated reservoir volume (SRV) fracturing completion technology and multi-well pad factory operation. Meanwhile, some opinions and Suggestions on the tight oil exploration and production in China are proposed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score0.894

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.169
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Mechanics and MaterialsSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207