MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Kengyilia: synopsis and key to species

2008· article· en· W1996921230 on OpenAlexaff
Junliang Yang, Chi Yen, Bernard R. Baum

Bibliographic record

VenueHereditas · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Disease Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyAgropyronTriticeaeElymusGenomeGenusBotanyInflorescenceKey (lock)NomenclatureTribeLeymusEvolutionary biologyGeneticsGeneTaxonomy (biology)PoaceaeEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kengyilia Yen and Yang is a new genus in the Triticeae from west China. It is similar to Roegneria C. Koch, from which it differs by the erect spikes with dense arrangement of spikelets and the densely pilose or hirsute lemmas. A cytological characteristic is the set of long chromosomes of the P genome, which can clearly be distinguished from the S and Y genomes of Roegneria and the S and H genomes of Elymus L. Morphologically Kengyilia is similar to Agropyron Gaertn from which it differs in having flat glumes, lemmas with rounded (rarely keeled) back and often by the presence of a terminal spikelet in the spikes. Sometimes its inflorescence is rather lax. Cytologically it differs from Agropyron in having the small chromosomes of the S and Y genomes in addition to the P genome set common to both. Thus, Kengyilia is a genus intermediate between Agropyron and Roegneria. To date 16 species are known to belong to Kengyilia. A key to species is presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.179

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0530.027

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHereditasSame topicPlant Disease Resistance and GeneticsFrench-language works237,207