Depth Profiling of the Optical Absorption Coefficient in Ultraviolet-Degraded Poly(Vinylchloride) Films by Dual Beam Light Profile Microscopy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dual beam laser light profile microscopy (LPM) was applied in this work to the depth mapping of the optical absorption coefficient in photo-degraded poly(vinyl chloride) films. Depth profiles followed the absorption coefficient of a conjugated polyene photoproduct at visible wavelengths in photolyzed films of approximately 200 mum thickness. Both continuous and layered (separable laminate) films were studied. The absorption coefficient profiles reconstructed from photo-degraded thin films showed the classic concentration profiles seen in the literature for PVC degraded in the presence of oxygen and nitrogen atmospheres. In the case of single thin layers with continuous properties, the depth profiles were smooth and regular with minimum spatial noise. In the LPM of laminate structures, more optical anomalies were present because of the multiply interfacial structures that appeared in both the images and the reconstructed depth profiles. Notwithstanding, it was possible to profile the optical absorption coefficient at a level of error comparable to standard microtome methods. The latter was determined by comparing the LPM results to a destructive layer-by-layer analysis performed in parallel on the imaged materials. The dual beam LPM method should be generally useful for establishing polyene concentration profiles in industrial materials produced by photochemical, thermal, and chemical degradation mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it