Human cell models to study small intestinal functions: Recapitulation of the crypt-villus axis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The intestinal epithelium is continuously and rapidly renewed by a process involving cell generation, migration, and differentiation, from the stem cell population located at the bottom of the crypt to the extrusion of the terminally differentiated cells at the tip of the villus. Because of the lack of normal human intestinal cell models, most of our knowledge about the regulation of human intestinal cell functions has been derived from studies conducted on cell cultures generated from experimental animals and human colon cancers. However, important advances have been achieved over recent years in the generation of normal human intestinal cell models. These models include (a) intestinal cell lines with typical crypt cell proliferative noncommitted characteristics, (b) conditionally immortalized intestinal cell lines that can be induced to differentiate, and (c) primary cultures of differentiated villuslike cells that can be maintained in culture for up to 10 days. Each of these models should help in the investigation of the specific aspects of human intestinal function and regulation. Furthermore, taken together, these models provide an integrated system that allows an in vitro recapitulation of the entire crypt-villus axis of the normal human small intestine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".