In vitro degradation of the moss <i>Hylocomium splendens</i> by three pleosporalean fungi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Three darkly pigmented species of conidial fungi of the family Pleosporaceae isolated from plants colonizing the Saskatchewan Glacier forefield were examined for potential roles in the degradation of moss gametophytes. Curvularia inaequalis and Ulocladium atrum isolated from bryophytes Ditrichum flexicaule and Tortella tortuosa , respectively, and Chalastospora gossypii from Saxifraga oppositifolia were inoculated onto autoclaved gametophytes of the moss Hylocomium splendens. All three species of fungi caused mass losses of the moss gametophytes. In vitro enzymatic tests revealed that all three fungi degraded cellulose, while none degraded insoluble polyphenols. When this material was examined by scanning electron microscopy, it was evident that the fungi had eroded the outer wall layer of the moss leaf cells to some extent but not the inner layer containing more lignin-like compounds. Once the outer wall layer was removed, the cells easily disarticulated. It is proposed that accumulations of these phenolics-rich leaf fragments subsequently ameliorate the rooting environment for vascular plants and have the potential to support the growth of basidiomycetes and other fungi, potentially mycorrhizal with pioneer vascular plants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".