Novel Surface-Micromachined Micromirrors for Optical MEMS Beam Manipulators
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A novel surface-micromachined electrostatic rotation micromirror is presented. The micromirror can be used to develop high performance optical beam steering manipulators for space applications based on an array of such micromirrors which are controlled by a feedback controller to compensate for jitter and misalignment during optical metrology or communication. The rotation micromirror has a two-layer structure and uses two repulsive force electrostatic actuators which generate a force to rotate the mirror out-of-plane. The rotation angle of the micromirror is not limited by the initial gap distance between the mirror plate and the substrate. By using repulsive force actuators, the surface-micromachined rotation micromirror can achieve a large rotation angle for a large mirror size without requiring any post-release assembly to fold the mirror out or raise it up. Prototypes fabricated using MUMPs are characterized by a mirror size of 312 μm × 312 μm, a stiffness of 0.485e−8Nm/rad, a mechanical rotation of 0° ∼ 2.2° at a driving voltage of 0 ∼ 200 V.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".