Instabilities in the Labrador Sea water mass structure during the last climatic cycle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the modern Labrador Sea, the North Atlantic deep water components are found below the ~2 km deep, intermediate Labrador Sea water (LSW) mass, which is renewed locally through winter convective mixing. This water mass structure remained relatively stable since ~9.5 14 C ka BP, as indicated by isotopic studies of foraminifer assemblages from deep-sea cores. Almost constant differences in δ 18 O values are observed between major species. These average -0.5 between the epipelagic species Globigerina bulloides and the mesopelagic species Neogloboquadrina pachyderma, left coiled, and -1 between Neogloboquadrina pachyderma and the benthic species Cibicides wuellerstorfi, after correction for Cibicides wuellerstorfi specific fractionation. These isotopic compositions represent thermohaline conditions in surface waters, in the pycnocline with the LSW, and in the deep component of the North Atlantic deep water, respectively. A drastically different structure characterized the glacial Labrador Sea. Differences in δ 18 O values of ~ -2 to -2.5 are then observed between Globigerina bulloides and benthic species, indicative of a strong halocline between the corresponding water masses, thus for reduced production of intermediate waters. During the same interval, Neogloboquadrina pachyderma shows 13 C and 18 O fluctuations of 1 to 1.5 amplitude, in phase with Heinrich-Bond events and higher frequency climate oscillations. The δ 18 O values in Neogloboquadrina pachyderma vary between those of Globigerina bulloides and of benthic foraminifers, suggesting large amplitude bathymetric fluctuations of the halo-thermocline above and below the bathymetric range occupied by Neogloboquadrina pachyderma. Minimum δ 18 O values in Neogloboquadrina pachyderma match intervals of maximum ice rafting deposition, such as the late Heinrich events, thus intervals with a deeper, more dilute buoyant surface water layer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".