Perfusion of Renal Allografts With Verapamil Improves Graft Function
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of adding a calcium channel antagonist to kidney allograft perfusate solution was assessed. All renal transplants in which both kidneys from the same donor used for transplantation were studied between November, 2003 and August, 2005 (n=46). The first renal allograft was perfused on the backtable with 1 L of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglurate solution and the second with 1 L of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglurate with 5 mg/L of verapamil. Both organs were transplanted in the usual manner. Baseline demographic parameters were similar between first and second kidney recipients other than BMI and cold ischemic time. At 6 and 12 months, renal function was significantly improved in the verapamil versus control cohort (creatinine clearance 73.8+/-23.5 mL/min vs. 55.8+/-17.0 mL/min, P<0.05 and 87.5+/-28.4 mL/min vs. 59.7+/-21.3 mL/min, P<0.05 respectively). Additionally, rates of hypotension during graft reperfusion and other adverse reactions were similar in both groups. In conclusion, verapamil supplemented perfusate significantly improved renal function posttransplantation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".