MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1997065559 · doi:10.1063/1.2356476

Isotope effects in the infrared spectra of OCS–He complexes and clusters

2006· article· en· W1997065559 on OpenAlexafffund
Ziad Abusara, Leila Borvayeh, N. Moazzen‐Ahmadi, A. R. W. McKellar

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
Canadian institutionsSteacie Institute for Molecular SciencesUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsInfraredSpectral linevan der Waals forceChemistryIntermolecular forceIsotopeInfrared spectroscopyKinetic isotope effectMoleculeCluster (spacecraft)Supersonic speedAtomic physicsHamiltonian (control theory)Molecular physicsIsotopic shiftPhysicsDeuteriumOpticsQuantum mechanicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Infrared spectra of the OCS-He van der Waals complex and of OCS-He(N) clusters have been studied in the region of the OCS nu1 fundamental band using a tunable diode laser to probe a pulsed supersonic slit jet. For the complex, the spectrum of the normal isotope, 16O12C32S-4He, has been considerably extended and the 34S- and 13C-substituted forms have been recorded for the first time. The data could be analyzed satisfactorily using a conventional asymmetric rotor Hamiltonian with sextic centrifugal distortion terms. For the clusters, the 34S- and 13C-substituted forms have been observed and assigned for N = 2-7, including some transitions with higher J values than previously reported for the normal isotope, e.g., R5. The observed vibrational shifts, relative to the free OCS molecule, were very similar to those of the normal isotope, and most of the difference could be explained by simple scaling. These results constitute a subtle and precise probe of intermolecular forces and dynamical effects in a system which is of current interest for cluster studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.582
Threshold uncertainty score0.313

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamicsFrench-language works237,207