INTELLIGENT MESHING FOR GEOPHYSICAL INVERSE PROBLEMS USING UNSTRUCTURED MESHES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mesh generation to solve geophysical forward problems is a thoroughly studied area that has seen the development of many methods and techniques. In geophysical inverse problems, a priori structured mesh is often used for inversion because the geometry of the underlying subsurface structures is unknown and mesh refinement is applied if needed by the user only after observing the inversion results. We present an intelligent meshing approach for an electrical resistivity tomography inverse problem. This new approach uses the Harris corner and edge detectors that are based on the local autocorrelation function of a signal (Harris and Stephens, 1988). The process optimizes the size of the inverse problem by refining areas where the boundaries of physical structure seems to be important and generates a more appropriate and optimum mesh for the inverse problem. The performance and robustness of the proposed algorithm are determined through a series of tests using 2D ERT modelled data and survey data. Tests on modelled data have demonstrated that the proposed meshing technique can reduce data misfit, produce a better model reconstruction, minimize the size of the inverse problem and reduce computational resource requirement. Tests on survey data from application such as ground water mapping have demonstrated that this new meshing approach produced data fit and inverse solutions that are comparable to conventional meshing and fine meshing techniques while minimizing the size of the inverse problem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".